
Java tutorials home
java.util.Random
Random number generators
XORShift
High quality random
Seeding generators
Entropy
SecureRandom
Random sampling
Random simulations and nextGaussian()
Random.nextGaussian() (ctd)We introduced the problem of a simulation, in this case of a network, where we need to generate random numbers that cluster around an average. In real life, values that "cluster" around an average tend to form a normal distribution, also sometimes called a Gaussian distribution. The nextGaussian() method lets us generate random numbers with this distribution. Normal distributionA normal distribution is essentially the way that values or measurements tend to cluster around an average. When values are influenced by a number of random factors, they tend to have this type of distribution. Lots of things in real life tend to be like that, from people's heights to timings of network packets. Other distributions do also occur for certain things, but the normal distribution is very common. Here is what a normal distribution looks like: The x axis shows integer values between 50 and 50. The height of each bar represents how many times a given x was returned by a random number generator with a normal distribution. In this case, the values have a mean (average) of zero, and a standard deviation of 15 (because that's what we asked the generator for). Standard deviationA normal distribution will always have the same "basic shape" illustrated above. The standard deviation then defines how "spread out" the distribution is (imagine taking hold of the left and right edges of the graph and "stretching" it out to give a larger standard deviation). More specifically, the values will be spread out so that:
(Note that, as we'll see below, we can similarly define typical limits for 99.9%, 99.99%, 99.999% etc, but there's no value where we can guarantee covering 100% of values!) Using nextGaussian()Now, with a bit of background, we can explain how we used nextGaussian() to produce the above graph.
The nextGaussian() method returns random numbers with a
mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1.
Remember, that this means that numbers returned by nextGaussian() will tend to "cluster" around 0 with the above shape, and that (approximately) 70% of values will be between 1 and 1. Based on the values returned by nextGaussian(), we can scale and shift them to get other normal distributions:
To produce the above graph, with an average value of 0 and a standard deviation of 15, we called: r.nextGaussian() * 15; Actually, because we wanted to get integer values, we called: int val = (int) Math.round(r.nextGaussian() * 15); Now, in our network simultation, to generate values with an average of 500 and a standard deviation of 100, we call: double val = r.nextGaussian() * 100 + 500; int millisDelay = (int) Math.round(val); Remember, with a standard deviation of 100, this means that 70% of values will fall between 500 +/ 100, in other words between 400 and 600 milliseconds; 95% of values will fall between 300 and 700 milliseconds. We can argue about (and calculate from actual measurements) what a realistic standard deviation is, but in any case, the result is going to be more realistic than calling nextInt(1000) and allowing, say, a time of 50ms to have the same likelihood as a time of 500ms. What are the minimum and maximum values with nextGaussian()?One thing that you may be wondering is what is the absolute minimum and maximum that nextGaussian() can return, or that could occur, say, in our network simulation with average 500ms and standard deviation 100ms. Well, theoretically at least, the slightly paradoxical answer is:
There is theoretically no absoluate minimum and maximum value
that can occur in a normal distribution.
Theoretically, the x axis of our graph above would extend to infinity in either direction; the closer you get to infinity, the more infinitessimally small the probability of that value occurring, but it could still occur... mathematically. In practice with Random.nextGaussian(), there will be some actual minimum/maximum, but not necessarily where we want it to be. The actual minimum/maximum is determined by the fact that nextGaussian() returns a double, and by the underlying psuedorandom number generator that in most cases will have some fixed sequence length (so there'll be some actual minimum or maximum out of all the possible numbers it could generate, if you're able to sit and wait for it to generate them all). Anyway, leaving the theory aside, the practical upshot is that nextGaussian() could sooner or later produce values outside our expected range. If we've chosen our standard deviation carefully, it may produce them with very very small probability; but eventually, it could produce them. For example, in our network simulation, if we leave the code as above, we risk very occasionally getting a negative network delay! This means that in most practical applications, we need to impose some artificial constraints on the range of values we allow. For example, in our network simulation, we deliberately discard negative (or zero) values: int delay; do { double val = r.nextGaussian() * 100 + 500; delay = (int) Math.round(val); } while (delay <= 0); 1. The figure quoted in some maths texts is 68.2% to one decimal place. But when we're talking about simulations, 70% is generally easier to remember and just as good a guide in practice. Written by Neil Coffey. Copyright © Javamex UK 2013. All rights reserved. 